{"id":26570,"date":"2012-04-30T13:46:00","date_gmt":"2012-04-30T12:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.influx.co.uk\/wordpress\/?p=26570"},"modified":"2014-06-13T10:39:41","modified_gmt":"2014-06-13T09:39:41","slug":"chronicles-of-phatitude","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.adrianflux.co.uk\/influx\/blog\/chronicles-of-phatitude\/","title":{"rendered":"Chronicles of Phatitude"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n

It’s been a while since we shared with you the fruits of our ongoing mission in which we attempt to define the elusive term ‘phatness’.<\/p>\n

It’s nothing to do with either hip-hop or the scourge of obesity that currently plagues the privileged nations of the world.<\/p>\n

Rather it’s something to do with stance, angle that is defined by, ermm… well- you know it when you see it.<\/p>\n

As you can see a perennial phat favourite the Ferrari F40 LM (rear view) – and it’s often the extreme bootiliciousness of the rear profile of our favourite sports cars that make it onto out phat list.<\/p>\n

But as often as not it’s the powerful, squat stance of other angles too. Witness the group B Quattro, the Camaro or the Ruf 911 – each of these scream of it’s adnirable girth without giving up the view from behind.<\/p>\n

And witness also how the stock-as-you-like pair of Lexus LFA super cars manage to carry their phatitude to the streets straight from the showroom – no motorsports homologation or street modification needed here…<\/p>\n\n\t\t